I think is not allowed the “loading page” and “dialog ad” of Airpush.
The first redirects directly to Google play, without user interaction.
And the second looks like a system interference
and again stupid questions…
Smartwall, banner, tapjoy incent - user have conscious action and is good informed about redirect, ads have usualy buttons like “download, install, check it, etc” - allowed
tapjoy - clicking on offer is action and user knows what happen, each offer have action description like “app install”, “watch video”. If not every, tapjoy have to change it
Own dialog like - “if you like app, go market to rate” - allowed
buttons - more apps, free apps, go pro, go market, go download, download, my apps, etc. - allowed
landing page - not allowed, redirecting user when he don’t want - airpush should delete landing page
dialog ads - allowed, user have choice, not to redirect or redirect but he should be good informed about action
Not allowed also redirect to market when user is using interface like app buttons, progress finished, application started, override back button, etc. User have to be conscious and informed about action. You have to use dialogs before redirect and ask user.
Nothing special changed and this discussion have 6 pages, stop panic and just read policy + think!
I even think that changes are better, good informed user = higher conversion and better cpm/cpa = bigger cash.
ramzixp do you know if the old Airpush SDK 6.0 is allowed? This SDK dont have the google play services SDK like the new one, do you know if this old SDK use the IMEI?
I have a lot of apps using this SDK 6.0
Thanks
For now, ad networks can use IMEI, yet. (they have time to 1st August) Don’t use old SDK, maybe it’s allowed but to check it, you have to decompile it. With new SDK’s you have 100% allowed. I think they will change their SDK in couple days to delete landing pages. This is the main problem now because for example, on application start you want to run smartwall ads and it’s redirecting to play without any info(landing page loaded). Maybe they will delete on server, etc.
Thanks ramzixp. And about the House of Ads (Madserver)? They use the Mobfox SDK. I send a email to them, but no answer yet.
and you will not get answer, madserve isn’t supported any more but I think it should use imei, haven’t any information about installs but ill check it when get some free time…
About the 15 calendar days of Content Policy notification and Ad ID.
Will the apps be subject to removal from Google Play if these apps use the old standalone Google Mobile Ads SDK v6.4.1 or lower?
Do we must use Google Play Services SDK for AdMob after the 15 calendar ?
Can we use the old standalone Google Mobile Ads SDK v6.4.1 or lower before August 1, 2014?
what about exit ads? and audio ads ? they wont allowed?
Have these ad networks updated to new SDKs using the new Google Advertising ID:
Airpush
AppBrain
AppFlood
Greystripe
Leadbolt HTML AppWall
Mmedia
PlayHaven
The ones I’ve checked don’t see any information about SDK changes to accomodate the new Google Policy.
Hi All,
New Appwiz SDK 3.0 - Google Compliant is Live !
New Appwiz SDK, 3.0, is currently available on our Dashboard, and which is fully compliant with the recent policy changes. This new SDK includes our comprehensive, industry-leading in-app advertising suite, which includes:
Dynamic AppWall
Premium Interstitial Ads
Exit Ads
NEW Smart Banner
For any questions can contact us at [email protected]
Anni
New Appwiz SDK 3.0 - Google Compliant is Live !*
…
*-we do not pay developers. It’s only prank! Got ya!
You should really stop this and move on, I don’t even know who are you…
Yea… "We didn’t pay you. You should move on and come to us again! "
Your ads here should be posted only on Prima Aprillis - so spam here all day long!
I had problems posting an article where it included a list of ad networks - perhaps it was seen as spam ?
Have any ad networks updated to new SDKs using the new Google Advertising ID ?
The ones I’ve checked don’t see any information about SDK changes to accomodate the new Google Policy.
The new Google policy says they consider the developer responsible for everything in the app - including the ad networks.
oh gotta love google…always trying to monopolize the industry
Spam apps - not allowed, so everything changed for you.
but all developers here knew you anni and also knew that appwiz is a scam
so you stop this and move on 
please admin ban this account to save other developers from being scammed
“Promotion via deceptive ads on websites, apps or other properties, including simulated system, service, or app notifications or alerts.”
How do you think they will monitor ads on websites? I don’t engage is that kind of promotion (or in any kind of promotion, for that matter), but it would interesting to know, how to they plan to monitor ads on websites.
On a side note, I’ve noticed, that they removed a rating/comment, which I made from my Genymotion (VBox) test account for my new app. 
I rated it from my own phone, my GF’s phone, and from Genymotion. In 2 days, the Genymotion rating was gone.
Hire 1 billion chinese workers under proxy to check all out.
Actually, I think it’ll work based on finks. Plenty of them would be willing to report.
Someone might actually place ads to competitor apps, and report them. That’s for sure will be fun.
After reviewing the new policy changes, we have deemed that we are still 100% Google Compliant.
Airpush Developer Update - 3-31-14
PM me if you have any questions or concerns.
Airpush Nick